Sorry, one last see also re. sgn:// scheme - URNs, Namespaces and Registries : This finding addresses the questions "When should URNs or URIs with novel URI schemes be used to name information resources for the Web?" and "Should registries be provided for such identifiers?". The answers given are "Rarely if ever" and "Probably not". Common arguments in favor of such novel naming schemas are examined, and their properties compared with those of the existing http: URI scheme.
Excellent! When PubSub started StructuredBlogging some years ago I expected that some of the major search engines would consider picking up the structured information we already have out in the wild. Technorati followed up with Microformats, now Google and XFN/FOAF
I can imagine that Google has been playing around with these technologies internally, but having APIs is a different thing.
You, sir, are a mind reader! I realize that many of the sites that are now wildly successful got that way by being responsive and innovative. Does anyone else that isn't into funding and media not realize that we have had it up to here (motioning with left hand to forehead) with another site that refuses to import our profile and can't seem to get the whole openID concept? http://carterfsmith.blogspot.com/2008/01/there-can-be-too-much-of-good-thing.html
This post describes the problem I have after registering for most social networks. Most of them ask me to pull data in from other places by asking for the userid and password of other services. From a security perspective, I don't like doing that. Your idea is a better way.
Wow! Bravo!
ReplyDeleteSome initial feedback from semwebbers:
http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2008-02-01.html#T20-21-05
(Nitpick - FOAF connections aren't really link /annotations/, rather they're globally typed links - the relations have URIs too).
[this is great] nice work!
ReplyDeleteSlightly bigger quibble (I just saw google-sgnodemapper) -
ReplyDeleteif Brad is http://brad.livejournal.com/, how do you say
"http://brad.livejournal.com/ was authored by Brad" ?
See also : WebArch, Google httpRange-14
Sorry, one last see also re. sgn:// scheme - URNs, Namespaces and Registries :
ReplyDeleteThis finding addresses the questions "When should URNs or URIs with novel URI schemes be used to name information resources for the Web?" and "Should registries be provided for such identifiers?". The answers given are "Rarely if ever" and "Probably not". Common arguments in favor of such novel naming schemas are examined, and their properties compared with those of the existing http: URI scheme.
This is wonderful. Thank you so much for doing this.
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDeleteWay to go Brad!
ReplyDeletehttpRange-14 was the first thing that popped into my mind as well.
ReplyDeleteOLDMEME
ReplyDeleteYou'd think that Google could hire someone to whip up a power-point or something :-)
ReplyDeleteNice work...
It's very interesting, Thanks.
ReplyDeletelook interesting
ReplyDeleteWay to go Brad!
ReplyDeleteCool and useful!
ReplyDeleteHow big the graph currently? Will it be made available for research?
ReplyDeletealthough i see the benefits in terms of convenience, i can't help but wonder about privacy issues
ReplyDeleteIf I enter my LJ account, it gives me photo parameter like this:
ReplyDelete"photo": "sgn://livejournal.com/?ident\u003duserpic"
It's possible that SGN library is making a mistake identifying "userpic" as user's identity.
Excellent! When PubSub started StructuredBlogging some years ago I expected that some of the major search engines would consider picking up the structured information we already have out in the wild. Technorati followed up with Microformats, now Google and XFN/FOAF
ReplyDeleteI can imagine that Google has been playing around with these technologies internally, but having APIs is a different thing.
Great work! Takes us closer in describing social web.
ReplyDeletenice
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteWhy not make one for business also :) - rel="business met"
ReplyDeleteWill it work with Facebook?
ReplyDeleteYou, sir, are a mind reader! I realize that many of the sites that are now wildly successful got that way by being responsive and innovative. Does anyone else that isn't into funding and media not realize that we have had it up to here (motioning with left hand to forehead) with another site that refuses to import our profile and can't seem to get the whole openID concept?
ReplyDeletehttp://carterfsmith.blogspot.com/2008/01/there-can-be-too-much-of-good-thing.html
This post describes the problem I have after registering for most social networks. Most of them ask me to pull data in from other places by asking for the userid and password of other services. From a security perspective, I don't like doing that. Your idea is a better way.
ReplyDeletesounds useful, definitely a to try thing
ReplyDeleteI'm still confuse about that.. please tell me about this indormation because I'm newbie in blogger
ReplyDeleteVisit my blog :
http://henry-business-and-marketing.blogspot.com/
yet another test: URL's are faces too. See http://www.servletsuite.com/socialwidget.htm
ReplyDelete"We're sorry, this video is no longer available."
ReplyDeleteJust perfect work!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, video is working, Hex.
Post all your links about video sharing scripts and sites
ReplyDeletevideosharingsites.blogspot.com/